Superintendent of Schools Makes
Contemptible Proposals to Skeptical Board
By
Robert E. Jensen
The Desert Independent
February 5, 2010
BLYTHE, Calif –
Supt. Dr. Yul Whitney was absent from the Budget Advisory Council meetings, the
PVTA, Teamsters and CSEA deliberations as well. If only he had attended, he
would have found employees willing to sacrifice “furlough” days, Academic
Coaches, Tier III funds and other less-painful sacrifices in order to salvage
the Blythe Middle School and High School Sports. If only he had attended, he
would not have embarrassed himself in front of a packed Board Room as he did at
the Special Board Meeting on Wednesday.
As such, he made three grossly outrageous recommendations to a
skeptical board that also caught the audience aghast.
To wit:
Get rid of High School Athletics. This would save a spurious
$180,000. This could also mean that the new-and-improved Football Field,
All-Weather Track and $2.3 million pool would be mothballed. Obviously, a
recommendation from a Supt. that has never taught or coached.
Go for a K-8 Alignment. This, of course would cost 15
teachers their livelihood – but never having taught, who cares. This, plus
the attitude of Capt. Carney that “Teachers are a dime a dozen.” No mention
was made of the cost of bringing in temporary bathrooms, portable classrooms
and allowing the cafeterias the extra room for the influx. All educators,
parents and site administrators turned their noses at this idea. So why did
a non-teaching Supt. think it would be the “cat’s pajamas”.
Every stake holding group recommended the eradiation of the
academic “coaches” that mentor those teachers that need little help. An
online poll of the PVTA membership found that 81% of the rank and file found
the “coaches” undesirable. Even so, the DAIT team stated that they were
necessary and were willing to pick up the cost of over $300,000. As such,
this motion ought to be considered a “moot point
A questionnaire by unnamed sources found that most teachers
considered the “coaches’ to be nothing more than administrative functionaries.
Even so, the DAIT team stated that they were necessary and were willing to pick
up the cost of over $300,000. As such, this motion ought to be considered a
“moot point.
The motion to table the motion put forward by Dr. Yul Whitney was
tabled by a less-than-impressed Board of Trustees until these next meeting. Dr.
Whitney would do well to consider the recommendations put forth by the Budget
Advisory Committee during that time.