The Wild Mustang: Myths & Facts
With Comments by The Desert
Independent
By
Robert WINKLER
The Desert Independent
January 11, 2010
A NOTE FROM THE PUBLISHER: I received
this news release from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). I believe you the
reader, deserved a little more. My comments are in blue and Italicized. Bob Winkler
Myth
#1: The BLM is selling or sending wild horses to slaughter.
Fact: This charge is absolutely
false. The Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management care
deeply about the well-being of wild horses, both on and off the range, and the
BLM does not and has not sold or sent horses or burros to slaughter.
Consequently, as the Government Accountability Office noted in a report issued
in October 2008, the BLM is not in compliance with a December 2004 amendment to
the 1971 Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act that directs the Bureau to sell
excess horses or burros “without limitation.”
We at the Desert
Independent are happy to hear that the BLM cares deeply about the Mustang horse.
We all know horse slaughter does not take place in the US (although sadly it is
still legal), so let’s just move on.
Myth
#2: Horses are held in crowded “holding pens.”
Fact: This assertion is false.
The BLM’s short-term holding corrals provide adequate space to horses, along
with clean feed and water, while long-term holding pastures – large ranches
located mainly in Kansas and Oklahoma – permit the horses to roam freely on
thousands of acres of grassland.
Please provide us
here at the Desert Independent with some pictures of your corrals and pastures. We
would like to let our readers decide if these wide open spaces out there in
Oklahoma and Kansas are adequate.
Myth
#3: Since 1971, the BLM has illegally taken away more than 19 million acres set
aside for wild horses and burros.
Fact: This claim is false.
No specific amount of acreage was “set
aside” for the exclusive use of wild horses and burros under the 1971 Wild
Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act.
The Act directed the BLM to determine the areas where horses and burros were
found roaming, and then to manage the animals within the boundaries of those
areas. More than four million acres of the 51.3 million acres identified as
roaming areas consisted of state or private land not controlled by the BLM.
There are numerous other reasons why another 14.9 million acres were removed
from wild horse and burro management, such as the absence of one or more
critical habitat components (such as forage or water) to sustain horses and
burros year-round; the claiming of some horses as private livestock during the
claiming period provided for in the 1971 law; the transfer of some BLM-managed
land to other Federal agencies through legislation; and conflicts with other
resources, such as threatened or endangered species.
If you look at what is really driving this politically, it is the ranchers who
see the Mustang as a competitor for their cattle’s hay. You make the hunter’s
argument that we need to kill them to save them. They did quite well without the
help of the BLM for a very long time. It is the cattle ranchers they don’t need.
Myth
#4: The BLM is managing wild horse herds to extinction.
Fact: This charge is
patently false. The BLM is seeking to
achieve the appropriate management level of 26,600 wild horses and burros on
Western public rangelands, or 10,000 fewer than the current West-wide population
of nearly 37,000. The BLM actively monitors the genetics of each herd by sending
genetic samples to Dr. Gus Cothran at Texas A&M University. Dr. Cothran
furnishes the BLM a report on every sample with recommendations for specific
herds.
When you are going
to quote an expert, especially your own expert, you should get it correct.
Accordingly, the recommended minimum number of Mustangs is 30,150 to sustain a
healthy population.
Myth
#5: The BLM removes wild horses to make room for more cattle grazing on public
rangelands.
Fact: This claim is totally false.
The removal of wild horses and burros from public rangelands is carried out to
ensure rangeland health, in accordance with land-use plans that are developed in
an open, public process. These land-use plans are the means by which the BLM
carries out its core mission, which is to manage the land for multiple uses
while protecting the land’s resources. Authorized livestock grazing on
BLM-managed land has declined by nearly 50 percent since the 1940s; actual
livestock grazing on public rangelands is even less than what is authorized
because of such factors as drought, wildfire, and climate change impacts.
We all know about
the open public process. We try to report all meetings here at The Desert
Independent. I don’t recall seeing an invite. When the BLM manages public land
for multiple use, you only have to take a short walk on that land to see what
they use it for…RANCHERS.
They would like us
to believe that the horses are over grazing the public lands. Not true according
to the Government Accountability Office, "BLM frequently used the lack of
detailed carrying capacity and range monitoring data to explain why it has not
taken action to reduce widely recognized overgrazing by domestic livestock…. The
primary cause of degradation in rangeland resources is poorly managed domestic
livestock (primarily cattle and sheep) grazing." BLM refused to make the
recommended proportionate reductions of private livestock vs. wild horses. (GAO
Report RCED-90/110, Rangeland Management/Improvements Needed in Federal Wild
Horse Program, 1990).
Myth
#6: The BLM lacks the legal authority to gather animals from overpopulated herds
or to use helicopters in doing so.
Fact: This assertion is false.
Section 1333 of the 1971 Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act mandates that
once the Interior Secretary "determines...on the basis of all information
currently available to him, that an overpopulation exists on a given area of the
public lands and that action is necessary to remove excess animals, he shall
immediately remove excess animals from the range so as to achieve appropriate
management levels." Section 1338 of the law authorizes
the BLM’s use of helicopters and motorized vehicles in its management
of wild horses and burros.
This is an insane
argument by the BLM. See Myth 7 where the BLM has killed over 38 horses through
their motorized gatherings. Using any vehicle at their convenience in their
insane desire to satisfy their rancher constituency one might expect them to add
a small jet or two to their arsenal.
Myth
#7: Gathers of wild horses are inhumane.
Fact: This claim is false. The
mortality rate resulting from helicopter-driven gathers is less than half of one
percent. In 2009, the number of gather-related
fatalities (out of more than 7,500 horses gathered) was 0.51 percent.
This means 38.25
horses were killed. Seems significant in light of the fact that the BLM is
posting a $10,000 reward for 6 horses killed in Nevada.
Myth
#8: If left alone, wild horses will limit their own population.
Fact: This is untrue. There is
absolutely no scientific evidence to
support the idea that wild horses will automatically limit their own population.
There were an estimated 17,300 wild horses in 1971, and those numbers rose to a
peak of more than 57,000 before the BLM was authorized and able to use
helicopters for gathers. If left unchecked, Mother Nature would regulate the
wild horse and burro population through the classic boom-and-bust cycle, where
the population increases dramatically, food becomes scarce, and the population
crashes through starvation.
Again, horses have
been here a long time along with thousands of other animal species. The only
time there is a problem is when it interferes with others who want to use the
land for their own profit.
Myth
#9: The Government Accountability Office, in a report issued in October 2008,
found that the BLM has been mismanaging the wild horse and burro program.
Fact: This claim is completely
false. The GAO made no such finding.
The full report can be accessed here:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0977.pdf
Readers: I suggest
that you do your own research. Or just think about who has the most to gain here
when this beautiful symbol of the west is gone.
Myth
#10: Wild horses are native to the United States.
Fact: This claim is false. Wild
horses are not, despite romantic speculation to the contrary, a native species.
American wild horses are descended
from domesticated horses brought over by European explorers that have adapted
successfully to the Western range.
Again the BLM is
patently wrong. The DNA may not be exact; however, all modern horses originated
here in North America. Yes, they migrated out as the last ice age advanced
10,000 years ago. However, and they returned with the rest of us.
Myth
#11: Two million wild horses roamed the United States in the 1800s.
Fact: This figure has never been
and cannot be substantiated. In a book
titled The Mustangs (1952) by J. Frank Dobie, the author noted that no
scientific estimate of wild horse numbers was made in the 19th century. He went
on to write: "All guessed numbers are mournful to history. My own guess is that
at no time were there more than a million mustangs in Texas and no more than a
million others scattered over the remainder of the West." Mr. Dobie's admitted
"guess" of no more than two million mustangs has over the years been
transformed into an asserted "fact" that two million mustangs actually roamed
America in the 1800s. When it comes to the historical wild horse population, a
substantiated and more relevant figure is the number found roaming in 1971, when
the BLM was given legal authority to protect and manage wild horses and burros.
That number was 17,300 mustangs (plus 8,045 burros), as compared to today's
population of 33,100 wild horses (plus 3,800 burros).
See Myths 1 – 10.
|